PDA

View Full Version : Conspiracy Theory.


The Flying Mouse
14 May 2007, 21:45
:twisted: 1. Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?

2. Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?

3. Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?

4. Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?

5. Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?

6. How could any pilot shoot a missile into a 2 meter-wide exhaust port, let alone a pilot with no formal training, whose only claim to fame was his ability to “bullseye womprats” on Tatooine? This shot, according to one pilot, would be “impossible, even for a computer.” Yet, according to additional evidence, the pilot who allegedly fired the missile turned off his targeting computer when he was supposedly firing the shot that destroyed the Death Star. Why have these discrepancies never been investigated, let alone explained?

7. Why has their been no investigation into evidence that the droids who provided the rebels with the Death Star plans were once owned by none other than Lord Vader himself, and were found, conveniently, by the pilot who destroyed the Death Star, and who is also believed to be Lord Vader’s son? Evidence also shows that the droids were brought to one Ben Kenobi, who, records indicate, was Darth Vader’s teacher many years earlier! Are all these personal connections between the conspirators and a key figure in the Imperial government supposed to be coincidences?

8. How could a single missile destroy a battle station the size of a moon? No records, anywhere, show that any battle station or capital ship has ever been destroyed by a single missile. Furthermore, analysis of the tape of the last moments of the Death Star show numerous small explosions along its surface, prior to it exploding completely! Why does all evidence indicate that strategically placed explosives, not a single missile, is what destroyed the Death Star?

Lord Kagan
14 May 2007, 22:06
Way too much time on your hands Neil :p

RadioMaster
14 May 2007, 22:11
5. Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?



He didnt 'decide to fly away' he was hit by a missile and lost his piloting control. :nope:
that's obvious! :yep::doh:

:p

SW31
15 May 2007, 00:47
he also uesd the force so knew it was going to happen lol

JanT
15 May 2007, 02:43
I sat and read that thinking it was serious. :oops:

allrevvedup
15 May 2007, 10:45
It is to some star wars fans :)


Jedi will be a religion soon, ya know:D

Lord Kagan
16 May 2007, 00:42
Im surrounded by Star Wars nerds...

RadioMaster
16 May 2007, 00:53
whats wrong with star wars?

mszee
16 May 2007, 01:04
whats wrong with star wars?

First three were good, second three - not so good and I hope he doesn't get around to making the other 3...there were supposed to be 9 in total...

Lord Kagan
16 May 2007, 11:13
whats wrong with star wars?

Nothing just some people take it waaaaaaaaaaaay too far and follow it too much

RadioMaster
16 May 2007, 13:31
First three were good, second three - not so good and I hope he doesn't get around to making the other 3...there were supposed to be 9 in total...

true.
Bought the last one (part 3, or however you wanna call it) when it came out on dvd, watched it once, and didnt had the urge to watch it again, while I watched the old movies about 20 times.

Lord Kagan
16 May 2007, 17:43
while I watched the old movies about 20 times.

How many times are they on TV each year?

mszee
16 May 2007, 17:45
true.
Bought the last one (part 3, or however you wanna call it) when it came out on dvd, watched it once, and didnt had the urge to watch it again, while I watched the old movies about 20 times.

Which is mighty ironic come to think of it...technology is so much more advanced now...AND Lucas owns his own special effects company...scripts were crap...

RadioMaster
16 May 2007, 18:54
How many times are they on TV each year?

ever heard of VHS?
taped it in like 97, and was watching it from then on from time to time, tho i havent seen it for about a year.

Which is mighty ironic come to think of it...technology is so much more advanced now...AND Lucas owns his own special effects company...scripts were crap...

proofs that films are still about good scripts, and acting, and that special effects are just the icing on the cake. The icing alone doesnt taste too nice.