LP
26 Jan 2011, 13:54
I thought I'd bring the issue of older singers into a new thread as this topic interests me.
My synopsis of the situation is this: As a society we don’t know how to deal with older people. 60 just isn’t old any more, 70 isn’t either, health permitting. Older people have such a huge ‘retirement’ period ahead of them that many chose or have no other choice but to continue working. My father runs a company erecting steel-framed buildings, he’s 62 and can’t imagine stopping. He has a range of people working for him from mid-twenties up to 68. And guess who’s carrying twice the load of materials up the ladders just as they did back in the 1960’s…. They are of a generation that will continue to work because that’s what they are about.
Transferring this to rock music….
Rock and Roll is so relatively young that we just don’t know what to do with older singers. We’re only really on the 3rd / 4th generation of performers. Bands like U2, Radiohead, Manics, Bon Jovi, are the next case in point after the Jaggers, Elton’s and Meat Loaf’s of the world. There is absolutely no reason why any older artists should stop…unless they are giving bad performances! A strange thing does seem to happen once a performer reaches 70+ though. Guys like Chuck Berry and Lenard Cohen gain a new-found respect, age-irrelevant. I’m not sure why this is.
So who is making it hard for older singers and why are they being so stupidly blind when it comes to the massive fan-bases and mature, dispensable, cash available? The executives behind the record companies and TV talent shows aren’t that far behind Meat in terms of age. It strikes me that they are missing a trick and spending all of their efforts on young cash whilst the other side of 40 remains untapped. I’ve no evidence to prove this, it’s just a feeling I get and wanted to share.
What we need is a new label with a completely reinvented approach. Someone needs to take a huge step back and look at the scenario logically, with fresh eyes. If I had a little bit more time and capital behind my businesses I’d be there like a shot. Give me 5 years.
I think that this topic would also make a fantastic TV documentary. I’d love to know everyone’s thoughts. I’m 31 by the way, if that makes a difference.
Luke
My synopsis of the situation is this: As a society we don’t know how to deal with older people. 60 just isn’t old any more, 70 isn’t either, health permitting. Older people have such a huge ‘retirement’ period ahead of them that many chose or have no other choice but to continue working. My father runs a company erecting steel-framed buildings, he’s 62 and can’t imagine stopping. He has a range of people working for him from mid-twenties up to 68. And guess who’s carrying twice the load of materials up the ladders just as they did back in the 1960’s…. They are of a generation that will continue to work because that’s what they are about.
Transferring this to rock music….
Rock and Roll is so relatively young that we just don’t know what to do with older singers. We’re only really on the 3rd / 4th generation of performers. Bands like U2, Radiohead, Manics, Bon Jovi, are the next case in point after the Jaggers, Elton’s and Meat Loaf’s of the world. There is absolutely no reason why any older artists should stop…unless they are giving bad performances! A strange thing does seem to happen once a performer reaches 70+ though. Guys like Chuck Berry and Lenard Cohen gain a new-found respect, age-irrelevant. I’m not sure why this is.
So who is making it hard for older singers and why are they being so stupidly blind when it comes to the massive fan-bases and mature, dispensable, cash available? The executives behind the record companies and TV talent shows aren’t that far behind Meat in terms of age. It strikes me that they are missing a trick and spending all of their efforts on young cash whilst the other side of 40 remains untapped. I’ve no evidence to prove this, it’s just a feeling I get and wanted to share.
What we need is a new label with a completely reinvented approach. Someone needs to take a huge step back and look at the scenario logically, with fresh eyes. If I had a little bit more time and capital behind my businesses I’d be there like a shot. Give me 5 years.
I think that this topic would also make a fantastic TV documentary. I’d love to know everyone’s thoughts. I’m 31 by the way, if that makes a difference.
Luke