mlukfc.com Forums - View Single Post

Meatles · 29 Apr 2003, 18:22

I can agree with you all

The cover for the US re-issue is pityful. What in hell were they thinking??
the cover is soooo non-meat style. it looks like a crappy 1950's gospel album - Some people I talked to at record shops were convinced it wasn't
even the same Meat Loaf who did Bat because the the cover and the poor
choices of tracks for the album.

The real kicker is that Prodigal never put any of the single releases on the
Re-issue!!!!???? WYSIWYG should have been put on the LP primarily because it was the only well-known chart debuting track of the album that BOOH fans could have looked back on and said "hey, I didnt know ML sang that?".

29 Apr 2003, 18:22	#20
Meatles Super Loafer Join Date: 14.04.2002 Location: Toronto, Ontario (born and raised in London England) Posts: 253	I can agree with you all The cover for the US re-issue is pityful. What in hell were they thinking?? the cover is soooo non-meat style. it looks like a crappy 1950's gospel album - Some people I talked to at record shops were convinced it wasn't even the same Meat Loaf who did Bat because the the cover and the poor choices of tracks for the album. The real kicker is that Prodigal never put any of the single releases on the Re-issue!!!!???? WYSIWYG should have been put on the LP primarily because it was the only well-known chart debuting track of the album that BOOH fans could have looked back on and said "hey, I didnt know ML sang that?".