For what it's worth. I sent feedback to this site around noon my time (which was 7 hours ago) and have a read at what I wrote. I was a bit harsh but I think I made my point.
"My comment is for the Entertainment column writer Joanna Hunkin for the
article "Future Music with Meat Loaf". I found your report lax and
lazy. It seemed you weren't in the right frame of mind to accept your
job as a journalist and listen with intent. I found you rather
distracted and would rather have been somewhere else. Unfortunately
there were no details of any song with the exception of a catchy tune
which this review did nothing for me as a consumer. I bet you were the
one in the back twirling their hair and chewing bubble gum waiting for
"class" to be over. Thank you for nothing. How would your bosses feel
that you discover your reviews of new music while multitasking on
personal matters in your "busy" life. Just awful, awful unprofessional
junk. What you should have done was review this record on it's content
as a professional music reviewer and give the consumer a taste of this
work musically...not as the lay person going about their day to day
lives. You missed t
he mark on your report. Too bad you were held captive....I would have
jumped at the opportunity to hear such a compilation from this true rock
legend. Ungratefully yours, Suzanne"
They responded:
"Hi there
We were very interested to read your comments about this. Thanks for
giving us this feedback. I have passed on your comments to the
producers.
Kind regards
Christine Wilton
Communications"
And again with:
"Hi Suzanne
Thanks for your feedback.
I have forwarded your email on to Joanna's boss and suggested he discuss
your comments with her.
You may know Joanna is very new to television and so we will handle this
quite gently but rest assured your comments will be passed on
Thanks again for taking the time to contact us
Andi"
I've responded back to Andi and we'll see what becomes.
Suzieq
|