Quote:
Originally Posted by tink
i remember seeing the original Elm Street moons ago when it first went into a video shop... i guess it was ... just to see ... then a couple years back i became a Johnny Depp fan and when i found out he was in the first Elm Street i bought it ... 10 bucks... good deal i thought... hehehe... and watched it again ... the only thing i remember from the first time viewing was that tongue coming through the phone... lol ... and thinking that the guy was a child molester ... he was ... wasn't it ? ... it's the thought i get seeing those little girls jumping rope... isn't that why the parents got together and burnt the house down ?... i forget again already ... i sound like a child molester at my age ooogling such a young Johnny Depp !!! ... lol .. not to make light ... well maybe... pedophiles are disgusting and sick and men with the affliction should have amputation and women be stitched up ... there's no cure ... right ? anyroad... i always thought Freddie Krueger to be a child molester ... OH and i got another look at the new Freddie ... ? ... no way ... the other guy is WAY coolCreepier ... and last film for me was April Fools' Day ... a teen slasher film... hehehe... awww... wtf... right ? ... hehehe ...
|
Wes Craven always said that Freddy was a child killer, not a molester. Actually makes a big difference as you have so many reports of molested children in the news, as I said it takes the fun/scare out of the whole thing.
Btw it's all about how it's depicted. In the original movie he may have been molesting the kids, but it was never a subject in the movie. In the new one this plays a big part. In one scene he's having the girl he used to molest pinned to a bed in a little girls dress and "plays" with her... would never have been possible in the original.