Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding
You just couldn't make this shit up if you tried.
Click---> HERE
At the end of the day animal cruelty is just wrong, if he wanted to eat the hamster then he should have killed it properly first. But jailing him for microwaving the hamster when there's child rapists walking free is even more wrong.
If anyone is interested in cooking an hamster (I'm not) then THIS website has some recipes. |
Can't say I agree with the logic you're applying to that
If the police find a paedophile then thet'll arrest them, but it's no excuse that "there are worse things I could do so nuking my pet in the microwave just for kicks is alright".
It's like people who get stopped by the police for speeding and ask if the copper "why are you bothering me when there are paedophilles in the world"?
Perhaps because you were breaking the law in broad daylight and not giving a flying ~~~~ who sees you do it?
It's a bullshit excuse.
If paedos operated in the street then they would be easy to catch, easy to send down.
Paedos should be punished and punished HARD (strung up by the neck in my book
) but you can't use the fact that there are paedophilles at large to lessen a crime like this.
And besides, hasn't there been a proven link that animal cruelty has been a starting point for many people who have gone on to commit much more serious and disgusting crimes
Catching a sick ~~~~er like that before he hurts a child has got to be a good thing in everyone's book surely?