Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding
I don't mind anyone disagreeing with me, but adding and twisting what I said on something serious is offensive.
At no point did I say he or anyone who's commited a crime, could use pedophiles walking the street as an excuse to get away with their crime, which is what you've implied I said.
My point is, the punishment doesn't fit the crime when there's more serious crimes that get a lesser punishment or even no punishment at all. That doesn't mean he shouldn't get punished because he should and some serious psychiatric help.
|
You better read your first post again then, because that's exactly what it says.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding
At the end of the day animal cruelty is just wrong, if he wanted to eat the hamster then he should have killed it properly first. But jailing him for microwaving the hamster when there's child rapists walking free is even more wrong.
|
No twists added.
Now if you'd said something like..............
Quote:
Originally Posted by paraphrasing Pudding
At the end of the day animal cruelty is just wrong, if he wanted to eat the hamster then he should have killed it properly first. But jailing him for microwaving the hamster when convicted child rapists are allowed to walk free with little more than a slap on the wrist is even more wrong.
|
...............I could agree with that.