View Single Post
Old 12 Nov 2012, 00:19   #46
CarylB
Mega Loafer
 
Join Date: 16.04.2003
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 5,910
Default

I didn't assume, I said "perhaps". My understanding is that the topic here is about downloading music free as opposed to purchasing it, thus enabling those involved in its production to make their living. To deprive an artist of their living by taking a painting or sculpture rather than paying for it would be in my view wrong, yes. I am not going to play any off topic game of debating intellectual copyright and the sometimes dubious claims to own it.
CarylB is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Dislike This Post.
4 Users Like This Post.
 

Page generated in 0.05442 seconds with 13 queries.