Well well well I must thank David for the best laugh I’ve had in ages !
However what we are forgetting here is a basic integrity where a non judgemental approach is required.
Wouldn’t psychology be a simple area if human behaviour fell into two distinct patterns?
My goodness, the likes of Freud, Piaget, Vygotsky, Jung etc would not have need to look any further in their research if things just popped either into box 1 or box 2.
So lets add to this theory and detail the further classification of users here:-
Type 3 - Those with no real interest other than to inflict hurt, pain or dissention
Type 4 - Those who are long term members and are dedicated fans, but who are now afraid to post in serious topics for fear of being subjected to torrents of abuse
Type 5 - Those with a degree of power, and how it is used
Type 6 - Those who hold their own rights and values over and above those of any other users
Type 7 - Those who are able to post in an inoffensive manner
Type 8 - Those who post in an offensive manner
Type 9 - Those where English is not a first language and need some leeway in the interpretation of their posts
Type 10- those with a completely different agenda on a totally different level
Well as you can see folks the arena is open, and whilst I may personally slot someone into a type from
1 - 10 or even unclassified, I would not chose to do so here and now.
Irrespective of any type or classification the REAL issues here are common decency and integrity, and that is what we need to get back to.
Personally I was very pleased to see Diane make a stand yesterday to try to draw a line in the sand with acceptable behaviour and standards, and believe it was a sad event that others then tried to undermine her actions.
MLUKFC need to start listening to members who are saying that they just don’t post in serious topics anymore because of the abuse that is thrown at them, this has been said to me on several occasions now by different members.
|