![]() |
#1 |
Armed ba$tard and Jo's other half.
![]() Join Date: 06.08.2002
Location:
![]()
Posts: 16,104
|
![]() ![]() Thought it might interest a few folks here. Hi Guys, There is a campaign going on by Bon Jovi Fans to get 'Livin On a Prayer' back into the UK charts. Heres the info... Hi Jovi Fans, We are going to try and get Bon Jovi back into the UK charts. Download 'Livin' On A Prayer' from Monday 29th January until Saturday 3rd February. Heres a link to Woolworths where you can download for 59p. But any of the official download sites will do! http://www.woolworths.co.uk/ww_p2/pr...l?pid=50342945 Please pass this email on to as many Jovi fans as you can. Any help would be appreciated! ![]() I'll sticky this for one week (wanna try out a new function ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Promoted to Wario's spellchecker
![]() Join Date: 17.09.2005
Location:
![]()
Posts: 12,947
|
![]()
It's an interesting experiment and had it have been "Living In Sin" I might've gone for it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Relentless
![]() Join Date: 21.11.2003
Location:
![]()
Posts: 18,694
|
![]()
Interesting is one word for it ... but I've heard of at least 6 other experiments of this ilk in the past week ... all I can see coming out of this is company profits increasing ... cynical me?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Promoted to Wario's spellchecker
![]() Join Date: 17.09.2005
Location:
![]()
Posts: 12,947
|
![]()
Can imagine the executives sitting in their offices thinking which old track shall we push this week!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Mega Loafer
![]() Join Date: 29.03.2006
Location:
![]()
Posts: 26,252
|
![]()
So you really think it's a push by record company???
I mean...I don't exactly disagree...just wondering... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Mega Loafer
![]() Join Date: 15.06.2005
Location:
![]()
Posts: 3,596
|
![]()
well it is a theory, i mean it wouldn't take much i suppose to log on as a dud name and suggest it to the fan forums, certainly beats advertising, just hit every official fanclub for any artist you hav with a reasonable following.
btw Neil i'm not dumping on this by any means, just thinking how it could be done is all ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |