03 Oct 2003, 11:44 | #51 | |
Mega Loafer
Join Date: 20.04.2003
Posts: 13,041
|
Quote:
while reading thru the posts ..i tried thinking 40 years back to what i paid for Beatles LPs and i have to think it was about...6 american dollars or so...i really can't remember... but if that is what it was...paying 11.99 for Meat's "LP" a week ago...seems an appropriate rise in pricing with the "cost of living" for 40 years... as for the rest...i don't copy..i buy a cd...and tote the wee light little thing back and forth to work with me in a carry case....in fact i tote up to 15 cds back and forth to work with me...thinking about it..lol...powers that be bless technology..the thoughts of carrying 15 LPS back and forth is a back breaking thought...lol... bottom line to me...the sales of cds is a part of how artists make their money... and altho one would copy a cd for their own use...there are some that would not... i can't see getting angry about record companies and artists wanting to protect their income.... crim..the IRS keeps taking my money...what am i supposed to do??? takes some of the money being made by the record companies and the artist too...what are we ALL supposed to do??? |
|
03 Oct 2003, 13:59 | #52 | |
Guest
Join Date: 19.04.2003
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
Since there is no money be transfered, no one will get any money from it. How the companies/organisations who exploit these services make their money, I don't know, and frankly my dear, I don't give a damn. [/bogart] There are some legal posibilities to aquire digital audio files, like Rhapsody, Pressplay, eMusic, etc. Here you have to pay for what you download. In one way or the other, that money ends up where it should be. To summarize: Filesharing = illegal = no one pay = no one gets money Legal download services = legal (duh!) = you pay for what you download = whoever is entitled to money from downloads gets it William (for everyone who can read Dutch, research papers on copyright, software licences (including shareware) and legal audio downloads are available at my website, under projects > research) |
|
04 Oct 2003, 02:16 | #53 | |
Super Loafer
Join Date: 06.02.2003
Location: Colorado ~ USA
Posts: 334
|
Quote:
Lady B |
|
06 Oct 2003, 18:15 | #54 |
Super Loafer
Join Date: 23.06.2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 363
|
thanks again for the information Evil, that clarifies things for me.
|
08 Oct 2003, 13:20 | #55 | |
Guest
Join Date: 19.04.2003
Posts: 2,238
|
Came across an article (here), with an statement I fully agree with:
Quote:
|
|
08 Oct 2003, 22:23 | #56 |
Super Loafer
Join Date: 09.04.2003
Location: Edinburgh, formerly Teesside
Posts: 671
|
Ok I buy my albums, i currently have 7 Meat Loaf Albums. Now heres the problem with copy protection.
I own a Portable MP3 Player. Now this means I have to record my albums onto my PC as MP3s and then put them onto my MP3 Player. This used to be easy. But now they are bring in stupid ideas that will make this illegal? I mean MP3 players arn't cheap! And neither are Albums. And if I pay for the Album why shouldnt I be able to put it onto my MP3 Player? I dont want to lug around a Portable CD Player when my MP3 Player is half the size and half the weight. But now these copy protection rules are making it nearly impossible for me to do this simple thing. I think that there DEFINATELY should be somewhere you can pay like 75p per track you want to download. This would put more interest into music and make it easier. |
09 Oct 2003, 12:44 | #57 | |
Super Loafer
Join Date: 30.04.2002
Location: Palmerston North, New Zealand (GMT+12)
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
I copied the CD for someone who I was sure would purchase (and since has purchased) the album. I used a computer at the university where I work, and Windows Media Player for the ripping. It was slow but had no other problems. The version I used was the German version, which has the copy control logo on it. I have now received the Australian version which does not have the logo or any other similar logo. |
|
09 Oct 2003, 13:13 | #58 | ||
Guest
Join Date: 19.04.2003
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
I haven't seen CHSIB for anything under €19 for the regular edition (without the bonus disk). DVDs? I don't have a clue. Rarely buy them... I do think the Euro is more expensive that the US Dollar at the moment, by the way Quote:
But good to know that Australia is not joining in in this copy scam. At least, not in this case. |
||
11 Oct 2003, 19:52 | #59 |
You dig.
Join Date: 02.04.2002
Location: On the fothermucker
Posts: 7,179
|
This is more general talk about "copy controlled" CDs, not exactly CHSIB related, and therefore OffTopic.
|
11 Oct 2003, 20:46 | #60 |
Sinner
Join Date: 15.04.2003
Location: cyber space
Posts: 2,457
|
I don't see why I shouldn't be able to make a copy for my own use of something I already have brought and paid for - i like to keep my favourite albums indoors and in the car.
I think this rather different to downloading stuff that is copyrighted or trying to record a live performance. |
11 Oct 2003, 20:54 | #61 | |
Mega Loafer
Join Date: 20.04.2003
Posts: 13,041
|
Quote:
|
|
11 Oct 2003, 22:54 | #62 |
Junior Loafer
Join Date: 14.04.2002
Posts: 25
|
I would like to add a bit.
Copy Controlled cds actually CAN be copied. When I put it in my cd-rom it automatically loads its player but it shows (!) 128 kbit - very low bitrate, so it seems like it reduces the quality when you play it through their player. I shut down this player and open my own - EasyCD for example. Then it plays it with almost no problems - it only halts for few seconds on first 10th second of the first song. To copy I can open for example program called Easy cd Creator and it easily copy tracks from the cd to hard drive. So all the money major labels spend on copy controlled program are spent for nothing or they just steal them and then show in the papers that they spent them to make this "control". Also copy controlled cd can't be more than 60 minutes long because player and program itself takes too much space of the cd. So there are some things to think about really... |