Hello and a Questinon

Claire T · 07 Aug 2002, 02:19

OK just thought I'd say "Hello" Coz i'm a newbie and sttuff and I just love meat loaf even though i'm a punk !

Anywayz I just wonderd short or long hair which is best?

I like the short hair only coz i find it more sexyer! :)

:)

OH went to see him in Liverpool he rocked. It was my frist time seeing him live and he's amazing. He has a talent that no other singer has and he just blew my mind!

Well that's it I could go on forever and ever but i wont!

Till the next time......

Jaymze · 07 Aug 2002, 05:12

I think the long hair was much better for dramatic effect in music videos of on stage but I think he looks better with it cut.

**The Flying Mouse** · 07 Aug 2002, 13:32

I think Meat looked his best with long hair and his theatrical costume.The groovy shirts and red hankie seem to have dissapeared.(Did anyone notice he didn't use a hankie for one song in Liverpool-Were you disapointed

)
But hey,who am I to argue with the man,at least he's still got that great powerful voice.

ChoccyBat · 07 Aug 2002, 19:52

Personally I thought his long hair did look better - and back then he would have looked wrong without it. But as he has got older - and maybe even a tad more calm (!), it perhaps suits him to have it shorter. At the end of the day, he still has that voice after some 25 years so we can't complain. I too was at Liverpool and indeed it does seem that the days of the crazy outfits and hankies are gone, but at least he isn't trying to pretend he's something he's not - he is a different man to the one back then, and his appearance reflects. At the end of the day, who looks better after years of rock n roll - him or Mick Jagger?

heat · 07 Aug 2002, 20:37

I personally think Meat's hair was much better long, only coz i find men with long hair stunning...and i thought Meat was beautiful with his hair long, not that he's not with it short, but he really did it fer me with his hair long :P

Claire T · 08 Aug 2002, 00:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteinBat

Personally I thought his long hair did look better - and back then he would have looked wrong without it. But as he has got older - and maybe even a tad more calm (!), it perhaps suits him to have it shorter. At the end of the day, he still has that voice after some 25 years so we can't complain. I too was at Liverpool and indeed it does seem that the days of the crazy outfits and hankies are gone, but at least he isn't trying to pretend he's something he's not - he is a different man to the one back then, and his appearance reflects. At the end of the day, who looks better after years of rock n roll - him or Mick Jagger?

You know I agree with you 100%

and as for Mick Jagger good music shame the face looks like a rased map of the andies

:P (sorry just had to say that )

Claire T · 08 Aug 2002, 01:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by heat

I personally think Meat's hair was much better long, only coz i find men with long hair stunning...and i thought Meat was beautiful with his hair long, not that he's not with it short, but he really did it fer me with his hair long :P

I honestly don't know about long hair on men. I think Meal Loaf just dose it for me long hair or short hair he's just hmmm LUSH! :)

07 Aug 2002, 02:19	#1
Claire T Rookie Join Date: 07.08.2002 Location: Preston England Posts: 4	Hello and a Questinon OK just thought I'd say "Hello" Coz i'm a newbie and sttuff and I just love meat loaf even though i'm a punk ! Anywayz I just wonderd short or long hair which is best? I like the short hair only coz i find it more sexyer! :) :) OH went to see him in Liverpool he rocked. It was my frist time seeing him live and he's amazing. He has a talent that no other singer has and he just blew my mind! Well that's it I could go on forever and ever but i wont! Till the next time......

07 Aug 2002, 05:12	#2
Jaymze Super Loafer Join Date: 10.12.2003 Location: Sunderland Posts: 265	I think the long hair was much better for dramatic effect in music videos of on stage but I think he looks better with it cut.

07 Aug 2002, 13:32	#3
The Flying Mouse Armed ba$tard and Jo's other half. Join Date: 06.08.2002 Location: In the middle of nowhere near the end of the line. Posts: 16,104	I think Meat looked his best with long hair and his theatrical costume.The groovy shirts and red hankie seem to have dissapeared.(Did anyone notice he didn't use a hankie for one song in Liverpool-Were you disapointed ) But hey,who am I to argue with the man,at least he's still got that great powerful voice.

07 Aug 2002, 19:52	#4
ChoccyBat Yorkie Join Date: 28.07.2002 Location: York Posts: 415	Personally I thought his long hair did look better - and back then he would have looked wrong without it. But as he has got older - and maybe even a tad more calm (!), it perhaps suits him to have it shorter. At the end of the day, he still has that voice after some 25 years so we can't complain. I too was at Liverpool and indeed it does seem that the days of the crazy outfits and hankies are gone, but at least he isn't trying to pretend he's something he's not - he is a different man to the one back then, and his appearance reflects. At the end of the day, who looks better after years of rock n roll - him or Mick Jagger?

07 Aug 2002, 20:37	#5
heat Rampant Loafer... Join Date: 29.07.2002 Location: welshy wales Posts: 5,706	I personally think Meat's hair was much better long, only coz i find men with long hair stunning...and i thought Meat was beautiful with his hair long, not that he's not with it short, but he really did it fer me with his hair long :P